GET TO KNOW ABOUT WORK PLACE ERGONOMY
Ergonomics is the science that deals with the healthy style of doing work. Each and every work that any person perform may predispose him or her to various musculoskeletal,neurological,cardiac and circulatory disfunction.Prevention is always better than cure, so before the person is prone for this sort of occupational
Hazards its better to know about healthy style of performing the work. Health is wealth as all of us know; person needs the good health to perform work for wealth. So being a physical therapist I suggest each and every person to have the concern about how they work and is the pattern they are following for their work is really ergogenic?
Who is the person susceptible??
People of each and every age group and work category are prone to get above mentioned disorder. Right from the household mother to office employe, drivers, student all the group are prone if the correct way of working is not followed…Anyway person who are more susceptible are mentioned below.
Office worker: Incorrect style of table and chair arrangement.Postion of computer on the table and distance between the person and material on the table to be handled frequently matters a lot.
Household Mother: The way she position herself during the cooking washing dishes and lifting the buckets if incorrect then really it is problematic.
Student: Way of sitting inside classroom, carrying the heavy bags, poor ventilation and lighting are really the causes for various musculoskeletal disorders.
Teacher: Last but not the least teachers should first educate before the student. Even prolonged standing for them can invite the deep vein thrombosis, a circulatory disorder where there is the clot formation in blood vessel.
What is the common disorder?
Neck pain
Back pain
Carpal tunnel syndrome
Deep vein thrombosis
What is the solution?
There is not any exact protocol for this sort of disorder. Because different people have different type of work place seating than that of other. So each and every person is to be assessed along with their work place setting individually. If any one wants to have the exact protocol to enhance the safety in their work place please mail me at sunilprfrmetal_pokhrel@yahoo.com for the detail.
Work place ergonomic in context of Nepal Is it a joke or really required?
AS far as my knowledge ,till today government is still in the passive about the work place ergonomy.Though there are ample of private offices but their effort on work place ergonomic is to be seen .
Recommended position for employee in office.
For contact go to my profile.
Friday, November 6, 2009
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Introduction
Ultrasound Therapy : The Basics
Introduction :
Ultrasound (US) is a form of MECHANICAL energy, not electrical energy and therefore strictly speaking, not really electrotherapy at all but does fall into the Electro Physical Agents grouping. Mechanical vibration at increasing frequencies is known as sound energy. The normal human sound range is from 16Hz to something approaching 15-20,000 Hz (in children and young adults). Beyond this upper limit, the mechanical vibration is known as ULTRASOUND. The frequencies used in therapy are typically between 1.0 and 3.0 MHz (1MHz = 1 million cycles per second).
Sound waves are LONGITUDINAL waves consisting of areas of COMPRESSION and RAREFACTION. Particles of a material, when exposed to a sound wave will oscillate about a fixed point rather than move with the wave itself. As the energy within the sound wave is passed to the material, it will cause oscillation of the particles of that material. Clearly any increase in the molecular vibration in the tissue can result in heat generation, and ultrasound can be used to produce thermal changes in the tissues, though current usage in therapy does not focus on this phenomenon (Williams 1987, Baker et al 2001, ter Haar 1999, Nussbaum 1997, Watson 2000, 2008). In addition to thermal changes, the vibration of the tissues appears to have effects which are generally considered to be non thermal in nature, though, as with other modalities (e.g. Pulsed Shortwave) there must be a thermal component however small. As the US wave passes through a material (the tissues), the energy levels within the wave will diminish as energy is transferred to the material. The energy absorption and attenuation characteristics of US waves have been documented for different tissues (see absorption section).
Ultrasound Waves :
FREQUENCY - the number of times a particle experiences a complete compression/rarefaction cycle in 1 second. Typically 1 or 3 MHz.
WAVELENGTH - the distance between two equivalent points on the waveform in the particular medium. In an ‘average tissue’ the wavelength @ 1MHz would be 1.5mm and @ 3 MHz would be 0.5 mm.
VELOCITY - the velocity at which the wave (disturbance) travels through the medium. In a saline solution, the velocity of US is approximately 1500 m sec-1 compared with approximately 350 m sec-1 in air (sound waves can travel more rapidly in a more dense medium). The velocity of US in most tissues is thought to be similar to that in saline.
These three factors are related, but are not constant for all types of tissue. Average figures are most commonly used to represent the passage of US in the tissues. Typical US frequencies from therapeutic equipment are 1 and 3 MHz though some machines produce additional frequencies (e.g. 0.75 and 1.5 MHz) and the ‘Longwave’ ultrasound devices operate at several 10’s of kHz (typically 40-50,000Hz – a much lower frequency than ‘traditional US’ but still beyond human hearing range.
The mathematical representation of the relationship is V = F.l where V = velocity, F = frequency and l is the wavelength.
US Waveform
The US beam is not uniform and changes in its nature with distance from the transducer. The US beam nearest the treatment head is called the NEAR field, the INTERFERENCE field or the Frenzel zone. The behaviour of the US in this field is far from regular, with areas of significant interference. The US energy in parts of this field can be many times greater than the output set on the machine (possibly as much as 12 to 15 times greater). The size (length) of the near field can be calculated using r2/l where r= the radius of the transducer crystal and l = the US wavelength according to the frequency being used (0.5mm for 3MHz and 1.5mm for 1.0 MHz).As an example, a crystal with a diameter of 25mm operating at 1 MHz will have a near field/far field boundary at : Boundary = 12.5mm2/1.5mm » 10cm thus the near field (with greatest interference) extends for approximately 10 cm from the treatment head when using a large treatment head and 1 MHz US .
When using higher frequency US, the boundary distance is even greater. Beyond this boundary lies the Far Field or the Fraunhofer zone. The US beam in this field is more uniform and gently divergent. The ‘hot spots’ noted in the near field are not significant. For the purposes of therapeutic applications, the far field is effectively out of reach.
One quality indicator for US applicators (transducers) is a value attributed to the Beam Nonuniformity Ratio (BNR). This gives an indication of this near field interference. It describes numerically the ratio of the intensity peaks to the mean intensity. For most applicators, the BNR would be approximately 4 - 6 (i.e. that the peak intensity will be 4 or 6 times greater than the mean intensity). Because of the nature of US, the theoretical best value for the BNR is thought to be around 4.0 though some manufacturers claim to have overcome this limit and effectively reduced the BNR of their generators to 1.0.
A couple of recent papers (Straub et al, 2008 and Johns et al 2007) have considered some of the inaccuracies associated with current machines and Pye (1996) presents some worrying data with regards the calibration of machines in clinical use in the UK.
Ultrasound Transmission through the Tissues
All materials (tissues) will present an impedance to the passage of sound waves. The specific impedance of a tissue will be determined by its density and elasticity. In order for the maximal transmission of energy from one medium to another, the impedance of the two media needs to be as similar as possible. Clearly in the case of US passing from the generator to the tissues and then through the different tissue types, this can not actually be achieved. The greater the difference in impedance at a boundary, the greater the reflection that will occur, and therefore, the smaller the amount of energy that will be transferred. Examples of impedance values can be found in the literature e.g. Robertson et al 2007,Ward 1986.
The difference in impedance is greatest for the steel/air interface which is the first one that the US has to overcome in order to reach the tissues. To minimise this difference, a suitable coupling medium has to be utilised. If even a small air gap exists between the transducer and the skin the proportion of US that will be reflected approaches 99.998% which means that there will be no effective transmission.
The coupling media used in this context include water, various oils, creams and gels. Ideally, the coupling medium should be fluid so as to fill all available spaces, relatively viscous so that it stays in place, have an impedance appropriate to the media it connects, and should allow transmission of US with minimal absorption, attenuation or disturbance. For a good discussion regarding coupling media, see Casarotto et al 2004, Klucinec et al 2000, Williams 1987 and Docker et al 1982. At the present time the gel based media appear to be preferable to the oils and creams. Water is a good media and can be used as an alternative but clearly it fails to meet the above criteria in terms of its viscosity. There is no realistic (clinical) difference between the gels in common clinical use (Poltawski and Watson 2007). The addition of active agents (e.g. anti-inflammatory drugs) to the gel is widely practiced, but remains incompletely researched. We are currently evaluating this intervention further.
As a matter of (clinical) interest, the US treatment should be cleaned with an alcohol based swab (not just wiped with tissue) between treatments (Schabrun et al, 2006) to minimise the potential transmission of microbial agents between patients.
In addition to the reflection that occurs at a boundary due to differences in impedance, there will also be some refraction if the wave does not strike the boundary surface at 90°. Essentially, the direction of the US beam through the second medium will not be the same as its path through the original medium - its pathway is angled. The critical angle for US at the skin interface appears to be about 15°. If the treatment head is at an angle of 15° or more to the plane of the skin surface, the majority of the US beam will travel through the dermal tissues (i.e. parallel to the skin surface) rather than penetrate the tissues as would be expected.
Absorption and Attenuation :
The absorption of US energy follows an exponential pattern - i.e. more energy is absorbed in the superficial tissues than in the deep tissues. In order for energy to have an effect it must be absorbed, and at some point this must be considered in relation to the US dosages applied to achieve certain effects (ter Haar, 1999, Watson, 2008, Watson and Young, 2008).
Because the absorption (penetration) is exponential, there is (in theory) no point at which all the energy has been absorbed, but there is certainly a point at which the US energy levels are not sufficient to produce a therapeutic effect. As the US beam penetrates further into the tissues, a greater proportion of the energy will have been absorbed and therefore there is less energy available to achieve therapeutic effects. The half value depth is often quoted in relation to US and it represents the depth in the tissues at which half the surface energy is available. These will be different for each tissue and also for different US frequencies. The table below gives some indication of typical (or average) half value depths for therapeutic ultrasound. (after Hoogland 1995)
1 MHz
3 MHz
Muscle
9.0 mm
3.0 mm
Fat
50.0 mm
16.5 mm
Tendon
6.2 mm
2.0 mm
As it is difficult, if not impossible to know the thickness of each of these layers in an individual patient, average half value depths are employed for each frequency
3 MHz 2.0 cm 1 MHz 4.0 cm
These values (after Low & Reed) are not universally accepted (see Ward 1986) and some research (as yet unpublished) suggests that in the clinical environment, they may be significantly lower.
To achieve a particular US intensity at depth, account must be taken of the proportion of energy which has been absorbed by the tissues in the more superficial layers. The table gives an approximate reduction in energy levels with typical tissues at two commonly used frequencies, and more detailed information is found in the dose calculation material
As the penetration (or transmission) of US is not the same in each tissue type, it is clear that some tissues are capable of greater absorption of US than others. Generally, the tissues with the higher protein content will absorb US to a greater extent, thus tissues with high water content and low protein content absorb little of the US energy (e.g. blood and fat) whilst those with a lower water content and a higher protein content will absorb US far more efficiently. Tissues can be ranked according to their relative tissue absorption and this is critical in terms of clinical decision making (Watson, 2008).
Although cartilage and bone are at the upper end of this scale, the problems associated with wave reflection mean that the majority of US energy striking the surface of either of these tissues is likely to be reflected. The best absorbing tissues in terms of clinical practice are those with high collagen content – LIGAMENT, TENDON, FASCIA, JOINT CAPSULE, SCAR TISSUE The application of therapeutic US to tissues with a low energy absorption capacity is less likely to be effective than the application of the energy into a more highly absorbing material. Recent evidence of the ineffectiveness of such an intervention can be found in Wilkin et al (2004) and Markert et al (2005) whilst application in tissue that is a better absorber will, as expected, result in a more effective intervention (e.g. Sparrow et al 2005, Leung et al 2004).
Most machines offer the facility for pulsed US output, and for many clinicians, this is a preferable mode of treatment. Until recently, the pulse duration (the time during which the machine is on) was almost exclusively 2ms (2 thousandths of a second) with a variable off period. Some machines now offer a variable on time though whether this is of clinical significance has yet to be determined. Typical pulse ratios are 1:1 and 1:4 though others are available (see dose calculations). In 1:1 mode, the machine offers an output for 2ms followed by 2ms rest. In 1:4 mode, the 2ms output is followed by an 8ms rest period. The adjacent diagram illustrates the effect of varying the pulse ratio.
The effects of pulsed US are well documented and this type of output is preferable especially in the treatment of the more acute lesions. Some machines offer pulse parameters that do not appear to be supported from the literature (e.g. 1:9; 1:20). Some manufacturers describe their pulsing in terms of a percentage rather than a ratio (1:1 = 50% 1:4 = 20% etc). The proportion of time that the machine is ON compared with OFF is a relevant factor in dosage calculations and further details are included in the dose calculation support material.
Therapeutic Ultrasound & Tissue Healing
One of the therapeutic effects for which ultrasound has been used is in relation to tissue healing. It is suggested that the application of US to injured tissues will, amongst other things, speed the rate of healing & enhance the quality of the repair (Watson 2006). The following information is intended to provide a summary of some of the essential research in this field together with some possible mechanisms through which US treatments may achieve these changes. It is not intended to be a complete explanation of these phenomena or a comprehensive review of the current literature. It may, none the less, provide some useful basic information for clinical application.
The therapeutic effects of US are generally divided into: THERMAL & NON‑THERMAL.
THERMAL:
In thermal mode, US will be most effective in heating the dense collagenous tissues and will require a relatively high intensity, preferably in continuous mode to achieve this effect. Many papers have concentrated on the thermal effectiveness of ultrasound, and much as it can be used effectively in this way when an appropriate dose is selected (continuous mode >0.5 W cm-2), the focus of this paper will be on the non thermal effects. Both Nussbaum (1998) and ter Haar (1999) have provided some useful review material with regards the thermal effects of ultrasound. Comparative studies on the thermal effects of ultrasound have been reported by several authors (e.g. Draper et al 1993, 1995a,b, Leonard et al 2004) with some interesting, and potentially useful results. Further work continues in our research centre with a comparison of contact heating and longwave ultrasound (Meakins and Watson, 2006) and comparison of different US regiemes combined with US (Aldridge and Watson – in preparation)
It is too simplistic to assume that with a particular treatment application there will either be thermal or non thermal effects. It is almost inevitable that both will occur, but it is furthermore reasonable to argue that the dominant effect will be influenced by treatment parameters, especially the mode of application i.e. pulsed or continuous. Baker et al (2001) have argued the scientific basis for this issue coherently.
Lehmann (1982) suggests that the desirable effects of therapeutic heat can be produced by US. It can be used to selectively raise the temperature of particular tissues due to its mode of action. Among the more effectively heated tissues are periosteum, collagenous tissues (ligament, tendon & fascia) & fibrotic muscle (Dyson 1981). If the temperature of the damaged tissues is raised to 40‑45°C, then a hyperaemia will result, the effect of which will be therapeutic. In addition, temperatures in this range are also thought to help in initiating the resolution of chronic inflammatory states (Dyson & Suckling 1978). Most authorities currently attribute a greater importance to the non‑thermal effects of US as a result of several investigative trials in the last 15 years or so.
NON‑THERMAL:
The non‑thermal effects of US are now attributed primarily to a combination of CAVITATION and ACOUSTIC STREAMING (ter Haar 1999, 2008 Baker et al 2001, Williams 1987). There appears to be little by way of convincing evidence to support the notion of MICROMASSAGE though it does sound rather appealing.
CAVITATION in its simplest sense relates to the formation of gas filled voids within the tissues & body fluids. There are 2 types of cavitation ‑ STABLE & UNSTABLE which have very different effects. STABLE CAVITATION does seem to occur at therapeutic doses of US. This is the formation & growth of gas bubbles by accumulation of dissolved gas in the medium. They take apx. 1000 cycles to reach their maximum size. The `cavity' acts to enhance the acoustic streaming phenomena (see below) & as such would appear to be beneficial. UNSTABLE (TRANSIENT) CAVITATION is the formation of bubbles at the low pressure part of the US cycle. These bubbles then collapse very quickly releasing a large amount of energy which is detrimental to tissue viability. There is no evidence at present to suggest that this phenomenon occurs at therapeutic levels if a good technique is used. There are applications of US that deliberately employ the unstable cavitation effect (High Intensity Focussed Ultrasound or HIFU) but it is beyond the remit of this summary.
ACOUSTIC STREAMING is described as a small scale eddying of fluids near a vibrating structure such as cell membranes & the surface of stable cavitation gas bubble (Dyson & Suckling 1978). This phenomenon is known to affect diffusion rates & membrane permeability. Sodium ion permeability is altered resulting in changes in the cell membrane potential. Calcium ion transport is modified which in turn leads to an alteration in the enzyme control mechanisms of various metabolic processes, especially concerning protein synthesis & cellular secretions.
The result of the combined effects of stable cavitation and acoustic streaming is that the cell membrane becomes ‘excited’ (up regulates), thus increasing the activity levels of the whole cell. The US energy acts as a trigger for this process, but it is the increased cellular activity which is in effect responsible for the therapeutic benefits of the modality (Watson 2000, 2008, Dinno et al 1989, Leung et al 2004).
MICROMASSAGE is a mechanical effect which appears to have been attributed less importance in recent years. In essence, the sound wave travelling through the medium is claimed to cause molecules to vibrate, possibly enhancing tissue fluid interchange & affecting tissue mobility. There is little, if any hard evidence for this often cited principle.
Ultrasound Application in relation to Tissue Repair
The process of tissue repair is a complex series of cascaded, chemically mediated events that lead to the production of scar tissue that constitutes an effective material to restore the continuity of the damaged tissue.
INFLAMMATION:
During the inflammatory phase, US has a stimulating effect on the mast cells, platelets, white cells with phagocytic roles and the macrophages (Nussbaum 1997, ter Haar 1999, Fyfe & Cahal 1982, Maxwell 1992, Watson 2008). For example, the application of ultrasound induces the degranulation of mast cells, causing the release of arachidonic acid which itself is a precursor for the synthesis of prostaglandins and leukotreine – which act as inflammatory mediators (Mortimer & Dyson 1988, Nussbaum 1997, Leung et al 2004). By increasing the activity of these cells, the overall influence of therapeutic US is certainly pro-inflammatory rather than anti-inflammatory. The benefit of this mode of action is not to ‘increase’ the inflammatory response as such (though if applied with too greater intensity at this stage, it is a possible outcome (Ciccone et al 1991), but rather to act as an ‘inflammatory opimiser’ (Watson 2007, 2008). The inflammatory is essential to the effective repair of tissue, and the more efficiently the process can complete, the more effectively the tissue can progress to the next phase (proliferation). It is effective at promoting the normality of the inflammatory events, and as such has a therapeutic value in promoting the overall repair events A further benefit is that the inflammatory chemically mediated events are associated with stimulation of the next (proliferative) phase, and hence the promotion of the inflammatory phase also acts as a promoter of the proliferative phase.
Employed at an appropriate treatment dose, with optimal treatment parameters (intensity, pulsing and time), the benefit of US is to make as efficient as possible to earliest repair phase, and thus have a promotional effect on the whole healing cascade. For tissues in which there is an inflammatory reaction, but in which there is no ‘repair’ to be achieved, the benefit of ultrasound is to promote the normal resolution of the inflammatory events, and hence resolve the ‘problem’ This will of course be most effectively achieved in the tissues that preferentially absorb ultrasound – i.e. the dense collagenous tissues.
PROLFERATION:
During the proliferative phase (scar production) US also has a stimulative effect (cellular up regulation), though the primary active targets are now the fibroblasts, endothelial cells and myofibroblasts . These are all cells that are normally active during scar production and US is therefore pro-proliferative in the same way that it is pro-inflammatory – it does not change the normal proliferative phase, but maximises its efficiency – producing the required scar tissue in an optimal fashion. Harvey et al (1975) demonstrated that low dose pulsed ultrasound increases protein synthesis and several research groups have demonstrated enhanced fibroplasia and collagen synthesis Recent work has identified the critical role of numerous growth factors in relation to tissue repair, and some accumulating evidence has identified that therapeutic US has a positive role to play in this heat shock proteins (Nussbaum and Locke 2007).
REMODELLING:
During the remodelling phase of repair, the somewhat generic scar that is produced in the initial stages is refined such that it adopts functional characteristics of the tissue that it is repairing. A scar in ligament will not ‘become’ ligament, but will behave more like a ligamentous tissue. This is achieved by a number of processes, but mainly related to the orientation of the collagen fibres in the developing scar.
The application of therapeutic ultrasound can influence the remodelling of the scar tissue in that it appears to be capable of enhancing the appropriate orientation of the newly formed collagen fibres and also to the collagen profile change from mainly Type III to a more dominant Type I construction, thus increasing tensile strength and enhancing scar mobility . Ultrasound applied to tissues enhances the functional capacity of the scar tissues . The role of ultrasound in this phase may also have the capacity to influence collagen fibre orientation as demonstrated in an elegant study by Byl et al (1996), though their conclusions were quite reasonably somewhat tentative.
Summary
The application of ultrasound during the inflammatory, proliferative and repair phases is not of value because it changes the normal sequence of events, but because it has the capacity to stimulate or enhance these normal events and thus increase the efficiency of the repair phases (ter Haar 99, Watson 2007, 2008, Watson & Young, 2008). It would appear that if a tissue is repairing in a compromised or inhibited fashion, the application of therapeutic ultrasound at an appropriate dose will enhance this activity. If the tissue is healing ‘normally’, the application will, it would appear, speed the process and thus enable the tissue to reach its endpoint faster than would otherwise be the case. The effective application of ultrasound to achieve these aims is dose dependent.
Ultrasound Dose Calculation
The most straightforward way to work out a particular dose of ultrasound for an individual patient is to use the combined available evidence and the flowchart below is based on just that. Following the flowchart is a piece of text that explains the process in some more detail .
Ultrasound Dose Calculations
One of the advantages of ultrasound therapy remains the reasonably broad range of trails from which effective treatment doses can be established.
In principle, there is no need for the often used 'recipe book' in which a list of conditions is produced alongside the treatment dose. One of the reasons for this is that the 'best' recipe for all the conditions one might encounter does not exist, certainly not from the evidence base. Secondly, there is effectively no need to learn a whole list of such formulas for successful application, one needs to apply the principles to the particular tissue in question, taking into account the relevant parameters.
The following 'dose calculations' offer one method (by no means the only one) by which the most likely clinically effective dose can be established. There is no guarantee the resulting dose will work, but it does offer a mechanism by which the dose which is most likely to work can be estimated.
Machine Frequency
Taking into account that the most frequently available treatment frequencies are 1 and 3MHz, the option between them relates primarily to the effective treatment depth that is required.
3MHz ultrasound is absorbed more rapidly in the tissues, and therefore is considered to be most appropriate for superficial lesions, whilst the 1MHz energy is absorbed less rapidly with progression through the tissues, and can therefore be more effective at greater depth.
The boundary between superficial and deep lesions is in some ways arbitrary, but somewhere around the 2-3cm depth is often taken as a useful boundary. Hence, if the target tissue is within 2-3cm (or an inch) of the skin surface, 3MHz treatments will be effective whilst treatments to deeper tissues will be more effectively achieved with 1MHz ultrasound.
Pulse Ratio
The pulse ratio determines the concentration of the energy on a time basis. The pulse ratio determines the proportion of time that the machine is ON compared with the OFF time. A pulse ratio of 1:1 for example means that the machine delivers one 'unit' of ultrasound followed by an equal duration during which no energy is delivered. The machine duty cycle is therefore 50%. A machine pulsed at a ratio of 1:4 will deliver one unit of ultrasound followed by 4 units of rest, therefore the machine is on for 20% of the time.
It is worthy of note that some machines offer pulse ratios for which no evidence can be identified to ascertain the effectiveness of the intervention. Pulse ratios of 1:9 or 1:20 for example can be found on machines but with no trial evidence to support their use.
It is suggested that pulse ratios of 1:4 are best suited to the treatment of acute lesions, reducing this as the tissue moves towards the chronic state moving through 1:3 and 1:2 to end up with 1:1 or continuous modes. Some machines are unable to deliver the most effective treatment modes and the therapist will need to compromise the treatment dose according to the facilities that are available.
It is of note that it is the state of the tissue that determines the most appropriate pulse ratio rather than simply the duration since the onset of the lesion. In a similar way to the clinical decision making process in manual or other therapies, tissue reactivity is the key. If the tissue in question behaves in an acute manner on assessment, then the lesion is effectively treated with an 'acute' dose. If it behaves as a chronic, less responsive tissue, then treat with a 'chronic' dose. Some patients will present several weeks after an injury or lesion onset, yet the problem exhibits 'acute behaviour' and should treated accordingly. Similarly, some lesions appear to move swiftly into chronic behaviour mode, and these are best managed with a dose estimated for chronic lesions. The key here is to treat what you find at assessment, rather than what the timescale says should be there.
Ultrasound Treatment Intensity
In a similar way to the pulse ratio decision, the intensity of ultrasound required at the target tissue will vary with the tissue state. The more acute the lesion, the smaller the 'strength' of the ultrasound that is required to achieve/maintain the tissue excitement. The more chronic the tissue state, the less sensitive, and hence the greater the intensity required at the lesion in order to instigate a physiological response.
One important factor is that some of the ultrasound energy delivered to the tissue surface will/may be lost before the target tissue (i.e. in the normal or uninjured tissues which lie between the skin surface and the target). In order to account for this, it may be necessary to deliver more at the surface than is required, therefore allowing for some absorption before the lesion, and allowing sufficient remaining ultrasound to achieve the desired effect.
The intensity required at the lesion can be determined from the following table :
Tissue State
Intensity required at the lesion (W/cm2)
Acute
0.1 - 0.3
Sub Acute
0.2 - 0.5
Chronic
0.3 - 0.8
The rate at which ultrasound is absorbed in the tissues can be approximately determined by the half value depth - this is the tissue depth at which 50% of the ultrasound delivered at the surface has been absorbed. The figures used for these estimates are average values in that it absolute values will vary with the thickness of various tissues (e.g. skin, fat, muscle etc). The average 1/2 value depth of 3MHz ultrasound is taken at 2.5cm and that of 1MHz ultrasound as 4.0 cm though there are numerous debates that continue with regards the most appropriate half value depth for different frequencies..
Ultrasound Therapy : The Basics
Introduction :
Ultrasound (US) is a form of MECHANICAL energy, not electrical energy and therefore strictly speaking, not really electrotherapy at all but does fall into the Electro Physical Agents grouping. Mechanical vibration at increasing frequencies is known as sound energy. The normal human sound range is from 16Hz to something approaching 15-20,000 Hz (in children and young adults). Beyond this upper limit, the mechanical vibration is known as ULTRASOUND. The frequencies used in therapy are typically between 1.0 and 3.0 MHz (1MHz = 1 million cycles per second).
Sound waves are LONGITUDINAL waves consisting of areas of COMPRESSION and RAREFACTION. Particles of a material, when exposed to a sound wave will oscillate about a fixed point rather than move with the wave itself. As the energy within the sound wave is passed to the material, it will cause oscillation of the particles of that material. Clearly any increase in the molecular vibration in the tissue can result in heat generation, and ultrasound can be used to produce thermal changes in the tissues, though current usage in therapy does not focus on this phenomenon (Williams 1987, Baker et al 2001, ter Haar 1999, Nussbaum 1997, Watson 2000, 2008). In addition to thermal changes, the vibration of the tissues appears to have effects which are generally considered to be non thermal in nature, though, as with other modalities (e.g. Pulsed Shortwave) there must be a thermal component however small. As the US wave passes through a material (the tissues), the energy levels within the wave will diminish as energy is transferred to the material. The energy absorption and attenuation characteristics of US waves have been documented for different tissues (see absorption section).
Ultrasound Waves :
FREQUENCY - the number of times a particle experiences a complete compression/rarefaction cycle in 1 second. Typically 1 or 3 MHz.
WAVELENGTH - the distance between two equivalent points on the waveform in the particular medium. In an ‘average tissue’ the wavelength @ 1MHz would be 1.5mm and @ 3 MHz would be 0.5 mm.
VELOCITY - the velocity at which the wave (disturbance) travels through the medium. In a saline solution, the velocity of US is approximately 1500 m sec-1 compared with approximately 350 m sec-1 in air (sound waves can travel more rapidly in a more dense medium). The velocity of US in most tissues is thought to be similar to that in saline.
These three factors are related, but are not constant for all types of tissue. Average figures are most commonly used to represent the passage of US in the tissues. Typical US frequencies from therapeutic equipment are 1 and 3 MHz though some machines produce additional frequencies (e.g. 0.75 and 1.5 MHz) and the ‘Longwave’ ultrasound devices operate at several 10’s of kHz (typically 40-50,000Hz – a much lower frequency than ‘traditional US’ but still beyond human hearing range.
The mathematical representation of the relationship is V = F.l where V = velocity, F = frequency and l is the wavelength.
US Waveform
The US beam is not uniform and changes in its nature with distance from the transducer. The US beam nearest the treatment head is called the NEAR field, the INTERFERENCE field or the Frenzel zone. The behaviour of the US in this field is far from regular, with areas of significant interference. The US energy in parts of this field can be many times greater than the output set on the machine (possibly as much as 12 to 15 times greater). The size (length) of the near field can be calculated using r2/l where r= the radius of the transducer crystal and l = the US wavelength according to the frequency being used (0.5mm for 3MHz and 1.5mm for 1.0 MHz).As an example, a crystal with a diameter of 25mm operating at 1 MHz will have a near field/far field boundary at : Boundary = 12.5mm2/1.5mm » 10cm thus the near field (with greatest interference) extends for approximately 10 cm from the treatment head when using a large treatment head and 1 MHz US .
When using higher frequency US, the boundary distance is even greater. Beyond this boundary lies the Far Field or the Fraunhofer zone. The US beam in this field is more uniform and gently divergent. The ‘hot spots’ noted in the near field are not significant. For the purposes of therapeutic applications, the far field is effectively out of reach.
One quality indicator for US applicators (transducers) is a value attributed to the Beam Nonuniformity Ratio (BNR). This gives an indication of this near field interference. It describes numerically the ratio of the intensity peaks to the mean intensity. For most applicators, the BNR would be approximately 4 - 6 (i.e. that the peak intensity will be 4 or 6 times greater than the mean intensity). Because of the nature of US, the theoretical best value for the BNR is thought to be around 4.0 though some manufacturers claim to have overcome this limit and effectively reduced the BNR of their generators to 1.0.
A couple of recent papers (Straub et al, 2008 and Johns et al 2007) have considered some of the inaccuracies associated with current machines and Pye (1996) presents some worrying data with regards the calibration of machines in clinical use in the UK.
Ultrasound Transmission through the Tissues
All materials (tissues) will present an impedance to the passage of sound waves. The specific impedance of a tissue will be determined by its density and elasticity. In order for the maximal transmission of energy from one medium to another, the impedance of the two media needs to be as similar as possible. Clearly in the case of US passing from the generator to the tissues and then through the different tissue types, this can not actually be achieved. The greater the difference in impedance at a boundary, the greater the reflection that will occur, and therefore, the smaller the amount of energy that will be transferred. Examples of impedance values can be found in the literature e.g. Robertson et al 2007,Ward 1986.
The difference in impedance is greatest for the steel/air interface which is the first one that the US has to overcome in order to reach the tissues. To minimise this difference, a suitable coupling medium has to be utilised. If even a small air gap exists between the transducer and the skin the proportion of US that will be reflected approaches 99.998% which means that there will be no effective transmission.
The coupling media used in this context include water, various oils, creams and gels. Ideally, the coupling medium should be fluid so as to fill all available spaces, relatively viscous so that it stays in place, have an impedance appropriate to the media it connects, and should allow transmission of US with minimal absorption, attenuation or disturbance. For a good discussion regarding coupling media, see Casarotto et al 2004, Klucinec et al 2000, Williams 1987 and Docker et al 1982. At the present time the gel based media appear to be preferable to the oils and creams. Water is a good media and can be used as an alternative but clearly it fails to meet the above criteria in terms of its viscosity. There is no realistic (clinical) difference between the gels in common clinical use (Poltawski and Watson 2007). The addition of active agents (e.g. anti-inflammatory drugs) to the gel is widely practiced, but remains incompletely researched. We are currently evaluating this intervention further.
As a matter of (clinical) interest, the US treatment should be cleaned with an alcohol based swab (not just wiped with tissue) between treatments (Schabrun et al, 2006) to minimise the potential transmission of microbial agents between patients.
In addition to the reflection that occurs at a boundary due to differences in impedance, there will also be some refraction if the wave does not strike the boundary surface at 90°. Essentially, the direction of the US beam through the second medium will not be the same as its path through the original medium - its pathway is angled. The critical angle for US at the skin interface appears to be about 15°. If the treatment head is at an angle of 15° or more to the plane of the skin surface, the majority of the US beam will travel through the dermal tissues (i.e. parallel to the skin surface) rather than penetrate the tissues as would be expected.
Absorption and Attenuation :
The absorption of US energy follows an exponential pattern - i.e. more energy is absorbed in the superficial tissues than in the deep tissues. In order for energy to have an effect it must be absorbed, and at some point this must be considered in relation to the US dosages applied to achieve certain effects (ter Haar, 1999, Watson, 2008, Watson and Young, 2008).
Because the absorption (penetration) is exponential, there is (in theory) no point at which all the energy has been absorbed, but there is certainly a point at which the US energy levels are not sufficient to produce a therapeutic effect. As the US beam penetrates further into the tissues, a greater proportion of the energy will have been absorbed and therefore there is less energy available to achieve therapeutic effects. The half value depth is often quoted in relation to US and it represents the depth in the tissues at which half the surface energy is available. These will be different for each tissue and also for different US frequencies. The table below gives some indication of typical (or average) half value depths for therapeutic ultrasound. (after Hoogland 1995)
1 MHz
3 MHz
Muscle
9.0 mm
3.0 mm
Fat
50.0 mm
16.5 mm
Tendon
6.2 mm
2.0 mm
As it is difficult, if not impossible to know the thickness of each of these layers in an individual patient, average half value depths are employed for each frequency
3 MHz 2.0 cm 1 MHz 4.0 cm
These values (after Low & Reed) are not universally accepted (see Ward 1986) and some research (as yet unpublished) suggests that in the clinical environment, they may be significantly lower.
To achieve a particular US intensity at depth, account must be taken of the proportion of energy which has been absorbed by the tissues in the more superficial layers. The table gives an approximate reduction in energy levels with typical tissues at two commonly used frequencies, and more detailed information is found in the dose calculation material
As the penetration (or transmission) of US is not the same in each tissue type, it is clear that some tissues are capable of greater absorption of US than others. Generally, the tissues with the higher protein content will absorb US to a greater extent, thus tissues with high water content and low protein content absorb little of the US energy (e.g. blood and fat) whilst those with a lower water content and a higher protein content will absorb US far more efficiently. Tissues can be ranked according to their relative tissue absorption and this is critical in terms of clinical decision making (Watson, 2008).
Although cartilage and bone are at the upper end of this scale, the problems associated with wave reflection mean that the majority of US energy striking the surface of either of these tissues is likely to be reflected. The best absorbing tissues in terms of clinical practice are those with high collagen content – LIGAMENT, TENDON, FASCIA, JOINT CAPSULE, SCAR TISSUE The application of therapeutic US to tissues with a low energy absorption capacity is less likely to be effective than the application of the energy into a more highly absorbing material. Recent evidence of the ineffectiveness of such an intervention can be found in Wilkin et al (2004) and Markert et al (2005) whilst application in tissue that is a better absorber will, as expected, result in a more effective intervention (e.g. Sparrow et al 2005, Leung et al 2004).
Most machines offer the facility for pulsed US output, and for many clinicians, this is a preferable mode of treatment. Until recently, the pulse duration (the time during which the machine is on) was almost exclusively 2ms (2 thousandths of a second) with a variable off period. Some machines now offer a variable on time though whether this is of clinical significance has yet to be determined. Typical pulse ratios are 1:1 and 1:4 though others are available (see dose calculations). In 1:1 mode, the machine offers an output for 2ms followed by 2ms rest. In 1:4 mode, the 2ms output is followed by an 8ms rest period. The adjacent diagram illustrates the effect of varying the pulse ratio.
The effects of pulsed US are well documented and this type of output is preferable especially in the treatment of the more acute lesions. Some machines offer pulse parameters that do not appear to be supported from the literature (e.g. 1:9; 1:20). Some manufacturers describe their pulsing in terms of a percentage rather than a ratio (1:1 = 50% 1:4 = 20% etc). The proportion of time that the machine is ON compared with OFF is a relevant factor in dosage calculations and further details are included in the dose calculation support material.
Therapeutic Ultrasound & Tissue Healing
One of the therapeutic effects for which ultrasound has been used is in relation to tissue healing. It is suggested that the application of US to injured tissues will, amongst other things, speed the rate of healing & enhance the quality of the repair (Watson 2006). The following information is intended to provide a summary of some of the essential research in this field together with some possible mechanisms through which US treatments may achieve these changes. It is not intended to be a complete explanation of these phenomena or a comprehensive review of the current literature. It may, none the less, provide some useful basic information for clinical application.
The therapeutic effects of US are generally divided into: THERMAL & NON‑THERMAL.
THERMAL:
In thermal mode, US will be most effective in heating the dense collagenous tissues and will require a relatively high intensity, preferably in continuous mode to achieve this effect. Many papers have concentrated on the thermal effectiveness of ultrasound, and much as it can be used effectively in this way when an appropriate dose is selected (continuous mode >0.5 W cm-2), the focus of this paper will be on the non thermal effects. Both Nussbaum (1998) and ter Haar (1999) have provided some useful review material with regards the thermal effects of ultrasound. Comparative studies on the thermal effects of ultrasound have been reported by several authors (e.g. Draper et al 1993, 1995a,b, Leonard et al 2004) with some interesting, and potentially useful results. Further work continues in our research centre with a comparison of contact heating and longwave ultrasound (Meakins and Watson, 2006) and comparison of different US regiemes combined with US (Aldridge and Watson – in preparation)
It is too simplistic to assume that with a particular treatment application there will either be thermal or non thermal effects. It is almost inevitable that both will occur, but it is furthermore reasonable to argue that the dominant effect will be influenced by treatment parameters, especially the mode of application i.e. pulsed or continuous. Baker et al (2001) have argued the scientific basis for this issue coherently.
Lehmann (1982) suggests that the desirable effects of therapeutic heat can be produced by US. It can be used to selectively raise the temperature of particular tissues due to its mode of action. Among the more effectively heated tissues are periosteum, collagenous tissues (ligament, tendon & fascia) & fibrotic muscle (Dyson 1981). If the temperature of the damaged tissues is raised to 40‑45°C, then a hyperaemia will result, the effect of which will be therapeutic. In addition, temperatures in this range are also thought to help in initiating the resolution of chronic inflammatory states (Dyson & Suckling 1978). Most authorities currently attribute a greater importance to the non‑thermal effects of US as a result of several investigative trials in the last 15 years or so.
NON‑THERMAL:
The non‑thermal effects of US are now attributed primarily to a combination of CAVITATION and ACOUSTIC STREAMING (ter Haar 1999, 2008 Baker et al 2001, Williams 1987). There appears to be little by way of convincing evidence to support the notion of MICROMASSAGE though it does sound rather appealing.
CAVITATION in its simplest sense relates to the formation of gas filled voids within the tissues & body fluids. There are 2 types of cavitation ‑ STABLE & UNSTABLE which have very different effects. STABLE CAVITATION does seem to occur at therapeutic doses of US. This is the formation & growth of gas bubbles by accumulation of dissolved gas in the medium. They take apx. 1000 cycles to reach their maximum size. The `cavity' acts to enhance the acoustic streaming phenomena (see below) & as such would appear to be beneficial. UNSTABLE (TRANSIENT) CAVITATION is the formation of bubbles at the low pressure part of the US cycle. These bubbles then collapse very quickly releasing a large amount of energy which is detrimental to tissue viability. There is no evidence at present to suggest that this phenomenon occurs at therapeutic levels if a good technique is used. There are applications of US that deliberately employ the unstable cavitation effect (High Intensity Focussed Ultrasound or HIFU) but it is beyond the remit of this summary.
ACOUSTIC STREAMING is described as a small scale eddying of fluids near a vibrating structure such as cell membranes & the surface of stable cavitation gas bubble (Dyson & Suckling 1978). This phenomenon is known to affect diffusion rates & membrane permeability. Sodium ion permeability is altered resulting in changes in the cell membrane potential. Calcium ion transport is modified which in turn leads to an alteration in the enzyme control mechanisms of various metabolic processes, especially concerning protein synthesis & cellular secretions.
The result of the combined effects of stable cavitation and acoustic streaming is that the cell membrane becomes ‘excited’ (up regulates), thus increasing the activity levels of the whole cell. The US energy acts as a trigger for this process, but it is the increased cellular activity which is in effect responsible for the therapeutic benefits of the modality (Watson 2000, 2008, Dinno et al 1989, Leung et al 2004).
MICROMASSAGE is a mechanical effect which appears to have been attributed less importance in recent years. In essence, the sound wave travelling through the medium is claimed to cause molecules to vibrate, possibly enhancing tissue fluid interchange & affecting tissue mobility. There is little, if any hard evidence for this often cited principle.
Ultrasound Application in relation to Tissue Repair
The process of tissue repair is a complex series of cascaded, chemically mediated events that lead to the production of scar tissue that constitutes an effective material to restore the continuity of the damaged tissue.
INFLAMMATION:
During the inflammatory phase, US has a stimulating effect on the mast cells, platelets, white cells with phagocytic roles and the macrophages (Nussbaum 1997, ter Haar 1999, Fyfe & Cahal 1982, Maxwell 1992, Watson 2008). For example, the application of ultrasound induces the degranulation of mast cells, causing the release of arachidonic acid which itself is a precursor for the synthesis of prostaglandins and leukotreine – which act as inflammatory mediators (Mortimer & Dyson 1988, Nussbaum 1997, Leung et al 2004). By increasing the activity of these cells, the overall influence of therapeutic US is certainly pro-inflammatory rather than anti-inflammatory. The benefit of this mode of action is not to ‘increase’ the inflammatory response as such (though if applied with too greater intensity at this stage, it is a possible outcome (Ciccone et al 1991), but rather to act as an ‘inflammatory opimiser’ (Watson 2007, 2008). The inflammatory is essential to the effective repair of tissue, and the more efficiently the process can complete, the more effectively the tissue can progress to the next phase (proliferation). It is effective at promoting the normality of the inflammatory events, and as such has a therapeutic value in promoting the overall repair events A further benefit is that the inflammatory chemically mediated events are associated with stimulation of the next (proliferative) phase, and hence the promotion of the inflammatory phase also acts as a promoter of the proliferative phase.
Employed at an appropriate treatment dose, with optimal treatment parameters (intensity, pulsing and time), the benefit of US is to make as efficient as possible to earliest repair phase, and thus have a promotional effect on the whole healing cascade. For tissues in which there is an inflammatory reaction, but in which there is no ‘repair’ to be achieved, the benefit of ultrasound is to promote the normal resolution of the inflammatory events, and hence resolve the ‘problem’ This will of course be most effectively achieved in the tissues that preferentially absorb ultrasound – i.e. the dense collagenous tissues.
PROLFERATION:
During the proliferative phase (scar production) US also has a stimulative effect (cellular up regulation), though the primary active targets are now the fibroblasts, endothelial cells and myofibroblasts . These are all cells that are normally active during scar production and US is therefore pro-proliferative in the same way that it is pro-inflammatory – it does not change the normal proliferative phase, but maximises its efficiency – producing the required scar tissue in an optimal fashion. Harvey et al (1975) demonstrated that low dose pulsed ultrasound increases protein synthesis and several research groups have demonstrated enhanced fibroplasia and collagen synthesis Recent work has identified the critical role of numerous growth factors in relation to tissue repair, and some accumulating evidence has identified that therapeutic US has a positive role to play in this heat shock proteins (Nussbaum and Locke 2007).
REMODELLING:
During the remodelling phase of repair, the somewhat generic scar that is produced in the initial stages is refined such that it adopts functional characteristics of the tissue that it is repairing. A scar in ligament will not ‘become’ ligament, but will behave more like a ligamentous tissue. This is achieved by a number of processes, but mainly related to the orientation of the collagen fibres in the developing scar.
The application of therapeutic ultrasound can influence the remodelling of the scar tissue in that it appears to be capable of enhancing the appropriate orientation of the newly formed collagen fibres and also to the collagen profile change from mainly Type III to a more dominant Type I construction, thus increasing tensile strength and enhancing scar mobility . Ultrasound applied to tissues enhances the functional capacity of the scar tissues . The role of ultrasound in this phase may also have the capacity to influence collagen fibre orientation as demonstrated in an elegant study by Byl et al (1996), though their conclusions were quite reasonably somewhat tentative.
Summary
The application of ultrasound during the inflammatory, proliferative and repair phases is not of value because it changes the normal sequence of events, but because it has the capacity to stimulate or enhance these normal events and thus increase the efficiency of the repair phases (ter Haar 99, Watson 2007, 2008, Watson & Young, 2008). It would appear that if a tissue is repairing in a compromised or inhibited fashion, the application of therapeutic ultrasound at an appropriate dose will enhance this activity. If the tissue is healing ‘normally’, the application will, it would appear, speed the process and thus enable the tissue to reach its endpoint faster than would otherwise be the case. The effective application of ultrasound to achieve these aims is dose dependent.
Ultrasound Dose Calculation
The most straightforward way to work out a particular dose of ultrasound for an individual patient is to use the combined available evidence and the flowchart below is based on just that. Following the flowchart is a piece of text that explains the process in some more detail .
Ultrasound Dose Calculations
One of the advantages of ultrasound therapy remains the reasonably broad range of trails from which effective treatment doses can be established.
In principle, there is no need for the often used 'recipe book' in which a list of conditions is produced alongside the treatment dose. One of the reasons for this is that the 'best' recipe for all the conditions one might encounter does not exist, certainly not from the evidence base. Secondly, there is effectively no need to learn a whole list of such formulas for successful application, one needs to apply the principles to the particular tissue in question, taking into account the relevant parameters.
The following 'dose calculations' offer one method (by no means the only one) by which the most likely clinically effective dose can be established. There is no guarantee the resulting dose will work, but it does offer a mechanism by which the dose which is most likely to work can be estimated.
Machine Frequency
Taking into account that the most frequently available treatment frequencies are 1 and 3MHz, the option between them relates primarily to the effective treatment depth that is required.
3MHz ultrasound is absorbed more rapidly in the tissues, and therefore is considered to be most appropriate for superficial lesions, whilst the 1MHz energy is absorbed less rapidly with progression through the tissues, and can therefore be more effective at greater depth.
The boundary between superficial and deep lesions is in some ways arbitrary, but somewhere around the 2-3cm depth is often taken as a useful boundary. Hence, if the target tissue is within 2-3cm (or an inch) of the skin surface, 3MHz treatments will be effective whilst treatments to deeper tissues will be more effectively achieved with 1MHz ultrasound.
Pulse Ratio
The pulse ratio determines the concentration of the energy on a time basis. The pulse ratio determines the proportion of time that the machine is ON compared with the OFF time. A pulse ratio of 1:1 for example means that the machine delivers one 'unit' of ultrasound followed by an equal duration during which no energy is delivered. The machine duty cycle is therefore 50%. A machine pulsed at a ratio of 1:4 will deliver one unit of ultrasound followed by 4 units of rest, therefore the machine is on for 20% of the time.
It is worthy of note that some machines offer pulse ratios for which no evidence can be identified to ascertain the effectiveness of the intervention. Pulse ratios of 1:9 or 1:20 for example can be found on machines but with no trial evidence to support their use.
It is suggested that pulse ratios of 1:4 are best suited to the treatment of acute lesions, reducing this as the tissue moves towards the chronic state moving through 1:3 and 1:2 to end up with 1:1 or continuous modes. Some machines are unable to deliver the most effective treatment modes and the therapist will need to compromise the treatment dose according to the facilities that are available.
It is of note that it is the state of the tissue that determines the most appropriate pulse ratio rather than simply the duration since the onset of the lesion. In a similar way to the clinical decision making process in manual or other therapies, tissue reactivity is the key. If the tissue in question behaves in an acute manner on assessment, then the lesion is effectively treated with an 'acute' dose. If it behaves as a chronic, less responsive tissue, then treat with a 'chronic' dose. Some patients will present several weeks after an injury or lesion onset, yet the problem exhibits 'acute behaviour' and should treated accordingly. Similarly, some lesions appear to move swiftly into chronic behaviour mode, and these are best managed with a dose estimated for chronic lesions. The key here is to treat what you find at assessment, rather than what the timescale says should be there.
Ultrasound Treatment Intensity
In a similar way to the pulse ratio decision, the intensity of ultrasound required at the target tissue will vary with the tissue state. The more acute the lesion, the smaller the 'strength' of the ultrasound that is required to achieve/maintain the tissue excitement. The more chronic the tissue state, the less sensitive, and hence the greater the intensity required at the lesion in order to instigate a physiological response.
One important factor is that some of the ultrasound energy delivered to the tissue surface will/may be lost before the target tissue (i.e. in the normal or uninjured tissues which lie between the skin surface and the target). In order to account for this, it may be necessary to deliver more at the surface than is required, therefore allowing for some absorption before the lesion, and allowing sufficient remaining ultrasound to achieve the desired effect.
The intensity required at the lesion can be determined from the following table :
Tissue State
Intensity required at the lesion (W/cm2)
Acute
0.1 - 0.3
Sub Acute
0.2 - 0.5
Chronic
0.3 - 0.8
The rate at which ultrasound is absorbed in the tissues can be approximately determined by the half value depth - this is the tissue depth at which 50% of the ultrasound delivered at the surface has been absorbed. The figures used for these estimates are average values in that it absolute values will vary with the thickness of various tissues (e.g. skin, fat, muscle etc). The average 1/2 value depth of 3MHz ultrasound is taken at 2.5cm and that of 1MHz ultrasound as 4.0 cm though there are numerous debates that continue with regards the most appropriate half value depth for different frequencies..
Patient education
complete patient education about osteoarthritis.
Introduction: It is the diseases of joint that occur as the result of unwanted stress on weight bearing joint of the body. It is characterized by erosion of the articular cartilage and erosion of the bone beneath the articular cartilage(subchondral bone).The most commonest joint it can affect is your knee and hip because these are the weight bearing -0joints in the body and are very much prone for the degeneration.
How it can happen in your joints?
When these joints are under the repetitive stress(prolonged heavy weight bearing),the cartilage(connective tissue) present on contacting surface of the bones forming the joint under goes the process of degeneration(damage) making the contacting surface of two bone rub each other. Rubbing produces a type of friction in between yours bones causing the microfracture. This microfracture heals thus resulting the abnormal bony out growth which is called as osteophytes or spurs.
What sign and symptom you may have?
Pain around your joint that is involved.
Swelling around your joint involved
You may feel instability around your joint involved.
You may feel a grating sensation while moving your involved joint.
There can be stiffness on your joint.
There is decreased range of motion on your involved joint and joint above and below.
Our suggestion to our beloved patients.
Although the sign and symptom are less in the early course of diseases, if it is not taken into account seriously it can completely damage your joint hamper your activities of daily living. Therefore our suggestion to you is that its earlier the care you receive, better the you and your carrier will be.
What the physical therapist can do?
We appreciate that whatever the medicine you take, it can make you better but we are the one who can bring back your strength whatever you lost before. We don’t add years to life but we add life to years.
Why electrotherapy and exercise therapy?
(1)Electrotherapy
ICE: It is used in the acute stage(inflammatory phase) because ice prevents the swelling by constricting your blood vessels. Ice decreases the pain signal from affected area because ice slows the nerve conduction velocity. But is absolutely contraindicated on peripheral vascular diseases. For how much time and what method to be applied, we choose that according to your tolerance and severity of your condition.
Rest: When your joint is under the stress you shouldn’t do such an activity that can further stress your joint. Here the rest means avoiding the weight bearing activities on your joint. You should completely avoid when the condition is too severe. Rest (unloading the joint) also helps to heal the inflammatory process more faster.
Ultrasound: Ultrasound used in physiotherapy is not the ultrasound that is applied to scan the organs of your body. What we physical therapist use is a therapeutic type (Treatment purpose).It has two affect that is thermal and non-thermal. Non thermal affect is used in the early stage of inflammation because it has pro inflammatory influence(healing faster),whereas thermal affect is used in the remodeling or chronic stage of your inflammation(end stage inflammation) just to improve the extensibility of the tissue(ligament, cartilage, muscle that were affected).The dose and time duration is determined by our physical therapist according to your condition and area of the treatment.
Electrical stimulation: The osteoarthritis is also a inflammatory condition. When there is inflammation pain will be there. Pain produces the spasm ( reflex sustained contraction of muscle to resist the motion just to avoid the pain) Spasm is normal phenomenon in body elicited by the muscle after injury or pain to avoid the further movement. But if it occurs for a long time it can result adaptive shortening and atrophy of muscle around the involved joint. Electrical stimulation can produce a painless contraction of muscles and thus prevents the atrophy. Quadriceps (muscles in front thigh) are the muscle that are prone for atrophy (decrease in the muscle size).we concentrate our therapy on this group of muscle.
TENS and IFT: Theses are the modalities we use for pain reduction. Electrode are placed on the area to be treated. Pain reduction also reduces the spasm on your muscles.
Exercise therapy
What ever the electrotherapeutic modalities we discussed creduce your signs and symptoms. Once the signs and symptoms get slower we prescribe you exercises. Only exercises can make you potent enough for activities of daily living. Exercises are not specific and limited and there is no particular exercise for particular exercise in fact exercise are dynamic. Exercises are designed according to patient condition, tolerance, vital signs, occupation and so on. Two person with osteoarthritis can be prescribed different exercises though they have same problem .Its only the physical therapist who can design and prescribe the exercises by using his\her biomechanical knowledge(study of human motion).so we request our patient and their family members not to believe on those person exercise prescription who do not have the knowledge of biomechanics. As we have already mentioned that exercise science is dynamic and one can not directly prescribe without a detailed examination. However there are few important exercises that we can present here.
Isometric quadriceps
This exercise is prescribed by therapist when patient is under the rest and cant move the joint due to pain or spasm on muscles of front thigh.you should lie on your back on the comfortable platform placing the small towel roll under the back part of your knee.Then just try to press that towel by your knee but don’t over press it or use your maximum strength.once your press the towel hold that press for 6 to 10 second .fell the contraction of your front thigh muscle while you press.duration and repetaion of this exercise is prescribed after we under go a detailed examination.
Multiple angle quadriceps:Once you can do a little movement on the knee(bending),then you can progress to multiple angle isometric exercises.At first you have to bend your knee up to the point of tolorence,then stop the movement.Try to press your sole of the foot away from you.hold a press for 6 t0 10 sec then gently release.
Isometric hamstring:hamstring is the group of muscle located on back thigh.Its action is to bend your knee joint (opposite of your quadriceps).There should balance on strength on hamstring and quadriceps because they are opposite in action(as per as Newton 3 law of motion,to each and every action there is equal and opposite reaction).At first you should matian the position like what you did in isometric quadriceps exercise.But the towel roll should be placed at the back of heel and you should press the towel down through your heel.
Free exercises : once you complete most of your range of motion ,we prescribe you a free exercises.These exercises maintain range of motion,promotes the joint nutrition and improves your strength.
Progressive resistive exercises:Here we add heavy weights on against your movements inorder to improve your strength completely.what weight for how long is determind after your detailed examination by our physical therapist.
Home advice
Do not stand for prolonged time period.If you have to stand use the support of the wall or any assistive devices.
Always elevators rather thatn stairclimbing.
Support to the railing and try to transmit some weight through the hand on railing.
Don’t lift or carry heavy weight on you.If you have to lift at any cost then lift from hand of opposite side.
Use western commodes with the adequate height.More the height more better it will be.
Avoid any activities that need sqqating .
Exercise your normal side leg sothat it is capable to compensate the weight bearing of affected limb.
Don’t sit on low height sofas or a chair.(for a normal person it should be distance from heel to popliteal fossa,a dimond shaped deppersion on the back side of knee.)
Don’t forget to exercise your knee even if the pain and stiffness subsides.
Try to maintain straight upright posture in front of mirror.
Visit your therapist for further advices and management
Introduction: It is the diseases of joint that occur as the result of unwanted stress on weight bearing joint of the body. It is characterized by erosion of the articular cartilage and erosion of the bone beneath the articular cartilage(subchondral bone).The most commonest joint it can affect is your knee and hip because these are the weight bearing -0joints in the body and are very much prone for the degeneration.
How it can happen in your joints?
When these joints are under the repetitive stress(prolonged heavy weight bearing),the cartilage(connective tissue) present on contacting surface of the bones forming the joint under goes the process of degeneration(damage) making the contacting surface of two bone rub each other. Rubbing produces a type of friction in between yours bones causing the microfracture. This microfracture heals thus resulting the abnormal bony out growth which is called as osteophytes or spurs.
What sign and symptom you may have?
Pain around your joint that is involved.
Swelling around your joint involved
You may feel instability around your joint involved.
You may feel a grating sensation while moving your involved joint.
There can be stiffness on your joint.
There is decreased range of motion on your involved joint and joint above and below.
Our suggestion to our beloved patients.
Although the sign and symptom are less in the early course of diseases, if it is not taken into account seriously it can completely damage your joint hamper your activities of daily living. Therefore our suggestion to you is that its earlier the care you receive, better the you and your carrier will be.
What the physical therapist can do?
We appreciate that whatever the medicine you take, it can make you better but we are the one who can bring back your strength whatever you lost before. We don’t add years to life but we add life to years.
Why electrotherapy and exercise therapy?
(1)Electrotherapy
ICE: It is used in the acute stage(inflammatory phase) because ice prevents the swelling by constricting your blood vessels. Ice decreases the pain signal from affected area because ice slows the nerve conduction velocity. But is absolutely contraindicated on peripheral vascular diseases. For how much time and what method to be applied, we choose that according to your tolerance and severity of your condition.
Rest: When your joint is under the stress you shouldn’t do such an activity that can further stress your joint. Here the rest means avoiding the weight bearing activities on your joint. You should completely avoid when the condition is too severe. Rest (unloading the joint) also helps to heal the inflammatory process more faster.
Ultrasound: Ultrasound used in physiotherapy is not the ultrasound that is applied to scan the organs of your body. What we physical therapist use is a therapeutic type (Treatment purpose).It has two affect that is thermal and non-thermal. Non thermal affect is used in the early stage of inflammation because it has pro inflammatory influence(healing faster),whereas thermal affect is used in the remodeling or chronic stage of your inflammation(end stage inflammation) just to improve the extensibility of the tissue(ligament, cartilage, muscle that were affected).The dose and time duration is determined by our physical therapist according to your condition and area of the treatment.
Electrical stimulation: The osteoarthritis is also a inflammatory condition. When there is inflammation pain will be there. Pain produces the spasm ( reflex sustained contraction of muscle to resist the motion just to avoid the pain) Spasm is normal phenomenon in body elicited by the muscle after injury or pain to avoid the further movement. But if it occurs for a long time it can result adaptive shortening and atrophy of muscle around the involved joint. Electrical stimulation can produce a painless contraction of muscles and thus prevents the atrophy. Quadriceps (muscles in front thigh) are the muscle that are prone for atrophy (decrease in the muscle size).we concentrate our therapy on this group of muscle.
TENS and IFT: Theses are the modalities we use for pain reduction. Electrode are placed on the area to be treated. Pain reduction also reduces the spasm on your muscles.
Exercise therapy
What ever the electrotherapeutic modalities we discussed creduce your signs and symptoms. Once the signs and symptoms get slower we prescribe you exercises. Only exercises can make you potent enough for activities of daily living. Exercises are not specific and limited and there is no particular exercise for particular exercise in fact exercise are dynamic. Exercises are designed according to patient condition, tolerance, vital signs, occupation and so on. Two person with osteoarthritis can be prescribed different exercises though they have same problem .Its only the physical therapist who can design and prescribe the exercises by using his\her biomechanical knowledge(study of human motion).so we request our patient and their family members not to believe on those person exercise prescription who do not have the knowledge of biomechanics. As we have already mentioned that exercise science is dynamic and one can not directly prescribe without a detailed examination. However there are few important exercises that we can present here.
Isometric quadriceps
This exercise is prescribed by therapist when patient is under the rest and cant move the joint due to pain or spasm on muscles of front thigh.you should lie on your back on the comfortable platform placing the small towel roll under the back part of your knee.Then just try to press that towel by your knee but don’t over press it or use your maximum strength.once your press the towel hold that press for 6 to 10 second .fell the contraction of your front thigh muscle while you press.duration and repetaion of this exercise is prescribed after we under go a detailed examination.
Multiple angle quadriceps:Once you can do a little movement on the knee(bending),then you can progress to multiple angle isometric exercises.At first you have to bend your knee up to the point of tolorence,then stop the movement.Try to press your sole of the foot away from you.hold a press for 6 t0 10 sec then gently release.
Isometric hamstring:hamstring is the group of muscle located on back thigh.Its action is to bend your knee joint (opposite of your quadriceps).There should balance on strength on hamstring and quadriceps because they are opposite in action(as per as Newton 3 law of motion,to each and every action there is equal and opposite reaction).At first you should matian the position like what you did in isometric quadriceps exercise.But the towel roll should be placed at the back of heel and you should press the towel down through your heel.
Free exercises : once you complete most of your range of motion ,we prescribe you a free exercises.These exercises maintain range of motion,promotes the joint nutrition and improves your strength.
Progressive resistive exercises:Here we add heavy weights on against your movements inorder to improve your strength completely.what weight for how long is determind after your detailed examination by our physical therapist.
Home advice
Do not stand for prolonged time period.If you have to stand use the support of the wall or any assistive devices.
Always elevators rather thatn stairclimbing.
Support to the railing and try to transmit some weight through the hand on railing.
Don’t lift or carry heavy weight on you.If you have to lift at any cost then lift from hand of opposite side.
Use western commodes with the adequate height.More the height more better it will be.
Avoid any activities that need sqqating .
Exercise your normal side leg sothat it is capable to compensate the weight bearing of affected limb.
Don’t sit on low height sofas or a chair.(for a normal person it should be distance from heel to popliteal fossa,a dimond shaped deppersion on the back side of knee.)
Don’t forget to exercise your knee even if the pain and stiffness subsides.
Try to maintain straight upright posture in front of mirror.
Visit your therapist for further advices and management
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)